Led the move of a client's entire on-premises virtualization footprint into Microsoft Azure, replacing physical infrastructure ownership with a managed cloud platform.
Delivered by ThirtyZero's founder in senior technical and compliance roles prior to founding the company. Client names and identifying details are withheld under confidentiality.
The client's entire infrastructure sat on-premises on VMware. Every capacity increase meant new hardware to procure, rack, and maintain, and every hardware refresh cycle competed for budget and time with the work that infrastructure was supposed to support.
Moving to Microsoft Azure meant re-platforming the full VMware estate onto Azure's infrastructure, without a phased pilot to fall back on. The migration needed to preserve what already worked while removing the physical hardware dependency underneath it.
Reviewed the full on-premises VMware environment, including virtual machine inventory, dependencies, and networking, to plan a migration path into Azure.
Led the move of the client's VMware workloads into Microsoft Azure, replacing on-premises hardware ownership with Azure's managed infrastructure.
Confirmed the migrated environment operated correctly in Azure and handed over a cloud infrastructure that no longer depended on the client maintaining its own physical hardware.
Staying on-premises means every capacity increase requires new hardware, and every refresh cycle is a capital project competing for budget. Moving to Azure replaces that hardware ownership with a managed cloud platform, so capacity becomes a configuration decision instead of a procurement one.
It depends on the size of the VM inventory, how interconnected the workloads are, and whether the client can tolerate a phased cutover or needs everything to move together. A full estate migration generally takes longer to plan than a partial one, but avoids leaving a hybrid environment running indefinitely.
Dependencies that are not documented anywhere. On-premises environments accumulate undocumented connections between systems over time, and finding them during migration planning, rather than after cutover, is what keeps a migration from turning into an outage.
Yes, phased migrations are common and often lower risk for complex environments. This particular engagement was scoped as a full estate migration, but the same assessment and migration approach applies whether the move happens in one pass or several.
A complete virtualization platform built from the hypervisor up, then used to move existing tenants off an aging NSX-v environment onto NSX-T without asking them to start over.
Read case studyBuilt alongside a Microsoft-partnered Dell team to bring Azure's cloud model on site, keeping financial-sector data inside the country rather than in a public Azure region.
Read case studyTell us what you are working with and what is not working. We will give you a straight answer on scope, approach, and whether it is a fit.
